Problem set · Sharp, Principles of Stable Isotope Geochemistry, 1st ed. (2007) · Answers →
[Worksheet constructed.]
Many of the isotopic processes occurring during precipitation can be understood from a logical evaluation of fractionation, temperature, and amount. Sometimes a variable may appear to control the delta values of precipitation in a particular direction when, in fact, the opposite is observed. Consider the positive correlation between temperature and delta value, where lower temperatures are proportional to lower delta values. However, the fractionation between water and water vapor increases with decreasing temperature, so precipitation should have a higher δ value. Why, then, do T and δ have a positive correlation?
Table 4.1 gives the relative abundance and delta values for the different water reservoirs of the Earth. If all of the ice caps melt, what will the new δ18O and δD values of the ocean be?
[Worksheet constructed. The mass fractions and δ18O are the Table 4.1 values used in the printed answer; the δD of ice is reconstructed from the printed result, check vs print.]
[Worksheet constructed, for part (a). Part (b) needs equations (4.18) and (4.19) from the text.]
The chapter's interactive Rayleigh distillation plot implements exactly this construction.
Craig defined SMOW in terms of NBS-1, a sample of Potomac River water, in the following way:
[Worksheet constructed. The VSMOW→VPDB conversion constants are the chapter-2 values, not printed in this problem.]
Many sedimentological records indicate that far more windblown dust accumulates during glacial periods than at other times. Correlating this dust with humidity, would you expect the deuterium excess parameter d to be larger or smaller in glacial vs. interglacial periods? Think of two geological materials that would allow you to test your conclusions.
Related interactive plots in this chapter's package: Rayleigh distillation, meteoric water line and d excess, δ–T relation.
Transcribed from Z. Sharp, Principles of Stable Isotope Geochemistry, 1st ed. (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007), end-of-chapter problem set (published source). Reference-scale names are written VSMOW, VPDB and VCDT where the original used SMOW, PDB and CDT, with the original numerical constants unchanged; historical usages (e.g. Craig's definition of SMOW) are kept as printed.
The source PDF's text layer scrambles mathematics, so equations and some values were reconstructed during transcription. Bracketed notes and anything tagged reconstructed or check vs print are editorial (constructed), not part of the original, and the warn-tagged items should be verified against the print copy.